![]() ![]() You are not just talking about a blunt fact, but more about a tragedy that, with a bit of imagination, you might almost see happening before your eyes.ģ) Here, depuis deux jours dénudait les arbres is just the background for the action cesser. But the author chose the imparfait for the same reason that you might say: in -365, the temple that took the Greek 120 years of time and energy was being taken down by Érostrate, instead of in -365 Érostrate destroyed a temple. We could use passé composé and then plus-que-parfait. ![]() 2 facts, one being anterior to the other. We need the passé composé for the most recent and the plus-que-parfait for the other one.Ģ) Here, this could be the same things. The main difference between imparfait and passe simple is that imparfait is used when there is no simple present perfect verb tense, while passe simple is used. This activity was created by a Quia Web subscriber. It is a paragraph so you need to read the whole text before trying to answer. Don't forget to check the right form of the past participle. ![]() Whereas the imparfait is for something that lasts in time and serves as a background for something else.ġ) This is the most regular of the sentences you provided. Pass compos, imparfait ou plus-que-parfait Fill in the blanks with the right form of the verb conjugated in either the pass compos, the imparfait or the plus-que-parfait. Something punctual, or at least the conclusion of something that lasted. Just to complete it a little:įirst of all, keep in mind that the passé composé is used for a fact.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |